Comparison between urethrostomy and penile resection for treatment of congenital penile urethral dilatation in calves

Sedeek, A. M.; Bakr, H. A.

doi:10.21608/jvmr.2009.77810

Comparison between urethrostomy and penile resection for treatment of congenital penile urethral dilatation in calves

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

A. M. Sedeek ¹
H. A. Bakr ²

¹ Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt.

² Department of Animal Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt.

10.21608/jvmr.2009.77810

Abstract

A clinical study was conducted under field condition during the period from January 2005 to December 2008 in Beni-Suef province on a total number of 15 calves suffered from congenital penile urethral dilatation at the perineal region. The affection was diagnosed and treated surgically under field condition and treatment included perineal urethrostomy (8 calves) and partial resection of penis including the dilated urethra (7 calves). Results revealed that duration of surgery for urethrostomy was shorter (mean 36.25 minutes) than penile resection (mean 85.71 minutes), bleeding was so extensive in penile resection group than urethrostomy one and cost of surgery was lower for urethrostomy than penile resection but aftercare cost was twice that of penile resection. Complications were higher in urethrostomy group, recovery period was nearly the same in both groups (14.37 and 14.28 days), mean body gain was higher in penile resection group (82 kg) than urethrostomy group (77.14 kg), and both groups considered of low quality animals at market as a result of loss of breeding capability and presence of urine scald. It could be concluded that both techniques are satisfactory but partial penile resection including the dilated urethra is superior to urethrostomy despite the higher cost and invasive surgical procedure.

Keywords